diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/References.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/References.html | 1031 |
1 files changed, 1031 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/References.html b/doc/References.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9bf4dc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/References.html @@ -0,0 +1,1031 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> +<html lang="en"><head><title>ISC-DHCP-REFERENCES: ISC DHCP References Collection</title> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> +<meta name="description" content="ISC DHCP References Collection"> +<meta name="keywords" content="ISC, DHCP, Reference Implementation"> +<meta name="generator" content="xml2rfc v1.36 (http://xml.resource.org/)"> +<style type='text/css'><!-- + body { + font-family: verdana, charcoal, helvetica, arial, sans-serif; + font-size: small; color: #000; background-color: #FFF; + margin: 2em; + } + h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { + font-family: helvetica, monaco, "MS Sans Serif", arial, sans-serif; + font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; + } + h1 { color: #900; background-color: transparent; text-align: right; } + h3 { color: #333; background-color: transparent; } + + td.RFCbug { + font-size: x-small; text-decoration: none; + width: 30px; height: 30px; padding-top: 2px; + text-align: justify; vertical-align: middle; + background-color: #000; + } + td.RFCbug span.RFC { + font-family: monaco, charcoal, geneva, "MS Sans Serif", helvetica, verdana, sans-serif; + font-weight: bold; color: #666; + } + td.RFCbug span.hotText { + font-family: charcoal, monaco, geneva, "MS Sans Serif", helvetica, verdana, sans-serif; + font-weight: normal; text-align: center; color: #FFF; + } + + table.TOCbug { width: 30px; height: 15px; } + td.TOCbug { + text-align: center; width: 30px; height: 15px; + color: #FFF; background-color: #900; + } + td.TOCbug a { + font-family: monaco, charcoal, geneva, "MS Sans Serif", helvetica, sans-serif; + font-weight: bold; font-size: x-small; text-decoration: none; + color: #FFF; background-color: transparent; + } + + td.header { + font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; + vertical-align: top; width: 33%; + color: #FFF; background-color: #666; + } + td.author { font-weight: bold; font-size: x-small; margin-left: 4em; } + td.author-text { font-size: x-small; } + + /* info code from SantaKlauss at http://www.madaboutstyle.com/tooltip2.html */ + a.info { + /* This is the key. */ + position: relative; + z-index: 24; + text-decoration: none; + } + a.info:hover { + z-index: 25; + color: #FFF; background-color: #900; + } + a.info span { display: none; } + a.info:hover span.info { + /* The span will display just on :hover state. */ + display: block; + position: absolute; + font-size: smaller; + top: 2em; left: -5em; width: 15em; + padding: 2px; border: 1px solid #333; + color: #900; background-color: #EEE; + text-align: left; + } + + a { font-weight: bold; } + a:link { color: #900; background-color: transparent; } + a:visited { color: #633; background-color: transparent; } + a:active { color: #633; background-color: transparent; } + + p { margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; } + p.copyright { font-size: x-small; } + p.toc { font-size: small; font-weight: bold; margin-left: 3em; } + table.toc { margin: 0 0 0 3em; padding: 0; border: 0; vertical-align: text-top; } + td.toc { font-size: small; font-weight: bold; vertical-align: text-top; } + + ol.text { margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; } + ul.text { margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; } + li { margin-left: 3em; } + + /* RFC-2629 <spanx>s and <artwork>s. */ + em { font-style: italic; } + strong { font-weight: bold; } + dfn { font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; } + cite { font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; } + tt { color: #036; } + tt, pre, pre dfn, pre em, pre cite, pre span { + font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace; font-size: small; + } + pre { + text-align: left; padding: 4px; + color: #000; background-color: #CCC; + } + pre dfn { color: #900; } + pre em { color: #66F; background-color: #FFC; font-weight: normal; } + pre .key { color: #33C; font-weight: bold; } + pre .id { color: #900; } + pre .str { color: #000; background-color: #CFF; } + pre .val { color: #066; } + pre .rep { color: #909; } + pre .oth { color: #000; background-color: #FCF; } + pre .err { background-color: #FCC; } + + /* RFC-2629 <texttable>s. */ + table.all, table.full, table.headers, table.none { + font-size: small; text-align: center; border-width: 2px; + vertical-align: top; border-collapse: collapse; + } + table.all, table.full { border-style: solid; border-color: black; } + table.headers, table.none { border-style: none; } + th { + font-weight: bold; border-color: black; + border-width: 2px 2px 3px 2px; + } + table.all th, table.full th { border-style: solid; } + table.headers th { border-style: none none solid none; } + table.none th { border-style: none; } + table.all td { + border-style: solid; border-color: #333; + border-width: 1px 2px; + } + table.full td, table.headers td, table.none td { border-style: none; } + + hr { height: 1px; } + hr.insert { + width: 80%; border-style: none; border-width: 0; + color: #CCC; background-color: #CCC; + } +--></style> +</head> +<body> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<table summary="layout" width="66%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><table summary="layout" width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1"> +<tr><td class="header">ISC-DHCP-REFERENCES</td><td class="header">D. Hankins</td></tr> +<tr><td class="header"> </td><td class="header">T. Mrugalski</td></tr> +<tr><td class="header"> </td><td class="header">ISC</td></tr> +<tr><td class="header"> </td><td class="header">May 20, 2011</td></tr> +</table></td></tr></table> +<h1><br />ISC DHCP References Collection</h1> + +<h3>Abstract</h3> + +<p>This document describes a collection of reference material + to which ISC DHCP has been implemented as well as a more + complete listing of references for DHCP and DHCPv6 protocols. +</p> +<h3>Copyright Notice</h3> + +<p>Copyright (c) 2006-2007,2009,2011 by Internet Systems + Consortium, Inc. ("ISC") +</p> +<p>Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for + any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the + above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all + copies. +</p> +<p>THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ISC DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES + WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF + MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL ISC BE LIABLE FOR + ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES + WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN + ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT + OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. +</p><a name="toc"></a><br /><hr /> +<h3>Table of Contents</h3> +<p class="toc"> +<a href="#anchor1">1.</a> +Introduction<br /> +<br /> +<a href="#anchor2">2.</a> +Definition: Reference Implementation<br /> +<br /> +<a href="#anchor3">3.</a> +Low Layer References<br /> + <a href="#anchor4">3.1.</a> +Ethernet Protocol References<br /> + <a href="#anchor5">3.2.</a> +Token Ring Protocol References<br /> + <a href="#anchor6">3.3.</a> +FDDI Protocol References<br /> + <a href="#anchor7">3.4.</a> +Internet Protocol Version 4 References<br /> + <a href="#anchor8">3.5.</a> +Unicast Datagram Protocol References<br /> +<br /> +<a href="#anchor9">4.</a> +BOOTP Protocol References<br /> +<br /> +<a href="#anchor10">5.</a> +DHCPv4 Protocol References<br /> + <a href="#anchor11">5.1.</a> +DHCPv4 Protocol<br /> + <a href="#anchor12">5.1.1.</a> +Core Protocol References<br /> + <a href="#anchor13">5.2.</a> +DHCPv4 Option References<br /> + <a href="#anchor14">5.2.1.</a> +Relay Agent Information Option Options<br /> + <a href="#anchor15">5.2.2.</a> +Dynamic DNS Updates References<br /> + <a href="#anchor16">5.2.3.</a> +Experimental: Failover References<br /> + <a href="#anchor17">5.3.</a> +DHCP Procedures<br /> +<br /> +<a href="#anchor18">6.</a> +DHCPv6 Protocol References<br /> + <a href="#anchor19">6.1.</a> +DHCPv6 Protocol References<br /> + <a href="#anchor20">6.2.</a> +DHCPv6 Options References<br /> +<br /> +<a href="#rfc.references1">7.</a> +References<br /> + <a href="#rfc.references1">7.1.</a> +Published DHCPv4 References<br /> + <a href="#rfc.references2">7.2.</a> +Published Common (DHCPv4/DHCPv6) References<br /> + <a href="#rfc.references3">7.3.</a> +Published DHCPv6 References<br /> +<br /> +<a href="#rfc.authors">§</a> +Authors' Addresses<br /> +</p> +<br clear="all" /> + +<a name="anchor1"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.1"></a><h3>1. +Introduction</h3> + +<p>As a little historical anecdote, ISC DHCP once packaged all the + relevant RFCs and standards documents along with the software + package. Until one day when a voice was heard from one of the + many fine institutions that build and distribute this software... + they took issue with the IETF's copyright on the RFC's. It + seems the IETF's copyrights don't allow modification of RFC's + (except for translation purposes). +</p> +<p>Our main purpose in providing the RFCs is to aid in + documentation, but since RFCs are now available widely from many + points of distribution on the Internet, there is no real need to + provide the documents themselves. So, this document has been + created in their stead, to list the various IETF RFCs one might + want to read, and to comment on how well (or poorly) we have + managed to implement them. +</p> +<a name="anchor2"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.2"></a><h3>2. +Definition: Reference Implementation</h3> + +<p>ISC DHCP, much like its other cousins in ISC software, is + self-described as a 'Reference Implementation.' There has been + a great deal of confusion about this term. Some people seem to + think that this term applies to any software that once passed + a piece of reference material on its way to market (but may do + quite a lot of things that aren't described in any reference, or + may choose to ignore the reference it saw entirely). Other folks + get confused by the word 'reference' and understand that to mean + that there is some special status applied to the software - that + the software itself is the reference by which all other software + is measured. Something along the lines of being "The DHCP + Protocol's Reference Clock," it is supposed. +</p> +<p>The truth is actually quite a lot simpler. Reference + implementations are software packages which were written + to behave precisely as appears in reference material. They + are written "to match reference." +</p> +<p>If the software has a behaviour that manifests itself + externally (whether it be something as simple as the 'wire + format' or something higher level, such as a complicated + behaviour that arises from multiple message exchanges), that + behaviour must be found in a reference document. +</p> +<p>Anything else is a bug, the only question is whether the + bug is in reference or software (failing to implement the + reference). +</p> +<p>This means: +</p> +<p> + </p> +<ul class="text"> +<li>To produce new externally-visible behaviour, one must first + provide a reference. +</li> +<li>Before changing externally visible behaviour to work around + simple incompatibilities in any other implementation, one must + first provide a reference. +</li> +</ul><p> + +</p> +<p>That is the lofty goal, at any rate. It's well understood that, + especially because the ISC DHCP Software package has not always been + held to this standard (but not entirely due to it), there are many + non-referenced behaviours within ISC DHCP. +</p> +<p>The primary goal of reference implementation is to prove the + reference material. If the reference material is good, then you + should be able to sit down and write a program that implements the + reference, to the word, and come to an implementation that + is distinguishable from others in the details, but not in the + facts of operating the protocol. This means that there is no + need for 'special knowledge' to work around arcane problems that + were left undocumented. No secret handshakes need to be learned + to be imparted with the necessary "real documentation". +</p> +<p>Also, by accepting only reference as the guidebook for ISC + DHCP's software implementation, anyone who can make an impact on + the color texture or form of that reference has a (somewhat + indirect) voice in ISC DHCP's software design. As the IETF RFC's + have been selected as the source of reference, that means everyone + on the Internet with the will to participate has a say. +</p> +<a name="anchor3"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.3"></a><h3>3. +Low Layer References</h3> + +<p>It may surprise you to realize that ISC DHCP implements 802.1 + 'Ethernet' framing, Token Ring, and FDDI. In order to bridge the + gap there between these physical and DHCP layers, it must also + implement IP and UDP framing. +</p> +<p>The reason for this stems from Unix systems' handling of BSD + sockets (the general way one might engage in transmission of UDP + packets) on unconfigured interfaces, or even the handling of + broadcast addressing on configured interfaces. +</p> +<p>There are a few things that DHCP servers, relays, and clients all + need to do in order to speak the DHCP protocol in strict compliance + with <a class='info' href='#RFC2131'>[RFC2131]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol,” March 1997.</span><span>)</span></a>. + + </p> +<ol class="text"> +<li>Transmit a UDP packet from IP:0.0.0.0 Ethernet:Self, destined to + IP:255.255.255.255 LinkLayer:Broadcast on an unconfigured (no IP + address yet) interface. +</li> +<li>Receive a UDP packet from IP:remote-system LinkLayer:remote-system, + destined to IP:255.255.255.255 LinkLayer:Broadcast, again on an + unconfigured interface. +</li> +<li>Transmit a UDP packet from IP:Self, Ethernet:Self, destined to + IP:remote-system LinkLayer:remote-system, without transmitting a + single ARP. +</li> +<li>And of course the simple case, a regular IP unicast that is + routed via the usual means (so it may be direct to a local system, + with ARP providing the glue, or it may be to a remote system via + one or more routers as normal). In this case, the interfaces are + always configured. +</li> +</ol> + +<p>The above isn't as simple as it sounds on a regular BSD socket. + Many unix implementations will transmit broadcasts not to + 255.255.255.255, but to x.y.z.255 (where x.y.z is the system's local + subnet). Such packets are not received by several known DHCP client + implementations - and it's not their fault, <a class='info' href='#RFC2131'>[RFC2131]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol,” March 1997.</span><span>)</span></a> + very explicitly demands that these packets' IP destination + addresses be set to 255.255.255.255. +</p> +<p>Receiving packets sent to 255.255.255.255 isn't a problem on most + modern unixes...so long as the interface is configured. When there + is no IPv4 address on the interface, things become much more murky. +</p> +<p>So, for this convoluted and unfortunate state of affairs in the + unix systems of the day ISC DHCP was manufactured, in order to do + what it needs not only to implement the reference but to interoperate + with other implementations, the software must create some form of + raw socket to operate on. +</p> +<p>What it actually does is create, for each interface detected on + the system, a Berkeley Packet Filter socket (or equivalent), and + program it with a filter that brings in only DHCP packets. A + "fallback" UDP Berkeley socket is generally also created, a single + one no matter how many interfaces. Should the software need to + transmit a contrived packet to the local network the packet is + formed piece by piece and transmitted via the BPF socket. Hence + the need to implement many forms of Link Layer framing and above. + The software gets away with not having to implement IP routing + tables as well by simply utilizing the aforementioned 'fallback' + UDP socket when unicasting between two configured systems is + needed. +</p> +<p>Modern unixes have opened up some facilities that diminish how + much of this sort of nefarious kludgery is necessary, but have not + found the state of affairs absolutely resolved. In particular, + one might now unicast without ARP by inserting an entry into the + ARP cache prior to transmitting. Unconfigured interfaces remain + the sticking point, however...on virtually no modern unixes is + it possible to receive broadcast packets unless a local IPv4 + address has been configured, unless it is done with raw sockets. +</p> +<a name="anchor4"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.3.1"></a><h3>3.1. +Ethernet Protocol References</h3> + +<p>ISC DHCP Implements Ethernet Version 2 ("DIX"), which is a variant + of IEEE 802.2. No good reference of this framing is known to exist + at this time, but it is vaguely described in <a class='info' href='#RFC0894'>[RFC0894]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Hornig, C., “Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over Ethernet networks,” April 1984.</span><span>)</span></a> + see the section titled "Packet format"), and + the following URL is also thought to be useful. +</p> +<p><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIX_Ethernet'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIX_Ethernet</a> +</p> +<a name="anchor5"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.3.2"></a><h3>3.2. +Token Ring Protocol References</h3> + +<p>IEEE 802.5 defines the Token Ring framing format used by ISC + DHCP. +</p> +<a name="anchor6"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.3.3"></a><h3>3.3. +FDDI Protocol References</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC1188'>[RFC1188]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Katz, D., “Proposed Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over FDDI Networks,” October 1990.</span><span>)</span></a> is the most helpful + reference ISC DHCP has used to form FDDI packets. +</p> +<a name="anchor7"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.3.4"></a><h3>3.4. +Internet Protocol Version 4 References</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC0760'>RFC760<span> (</span><span class='info'>Postel, J., “DoD standard Internet Protocol,” January 1980.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC0760] fundamentally defines the + bare IPv4 protocol which ISC DHCP implements. +</p> +<a name="anchor8"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.3.5"></a><h3>3.5. +Unicast Datagram Protocol References</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC0768'>RFC768<span> (</span><span class='info'>Postel, J., “User Datagram Protocol,” August 1980.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC0768] defines the User Datagram + Protocol that ultimately carries the DHCP or BOOTP protocol. The + destination DHCP server port is 67, the client port is 68. Source + ports are irrelevant. +</p> +<a name="anchor9"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.4"></a><h3>4. +BOOTP Protocol References</h3> + +<p>The DHCP Protocol is strange among protocols in that it is + grafted over the top of another protocol - BOOTP (but we don't + call it "DHCP over BOOTP" like we do, say "TCP over IP"). BOOTP + and DHCP share UDP packet formats - DHCP is merely a conventional + use of both BOOTP header fields and the trailing 'options' space. +</p> +<p>The ISC DHCP server supports BOOTP clients conforming to + <a class='info' href='#RFC0951'>RFC951<span> (</span><span class='info'>Croft, B. and J. Gilmore, “Bootstrap Protocol,” September 1985.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC0951] and <a class='info' href='#RFC1542'>RFC1542<span> (</span><span class='info'>Wimer, W., “Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol,” October 1993.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC1542]. +</p> +<a name="anchor10"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5"></a><h3>5. +DHCPv4 Protocol References</h3> + +<a name="anchor11"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5.1"></a><h3>5.1. +DHCPv4 Protocol</h3> + +<p>"The DHCP[v4] Protocol" is not defined in a single document. The + following collection of references of what ISC DHCP terms "The + DHCPv4 Protocol". +</p> +<a name="anchor12"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5.1.1"></a><h3>5.1.1. +Core Protocol References</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2131'>RFC2131<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol,” March 1997.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC2131] defines the protocol format + and procedures. ISC DHCP is not known to diverge from this document + in any way. There are, however, a few points on which different + implementations have arisen out of vagueries in the document. + DHCP Clients exist which, at one time, present themselves as using + a Client Identifier Option which is equal to the client's hardware + address. Later, the client transmits DHCP packets with no Client + Identifier Option present - essentially identifying themselves using + the hardware address. Some DHCP Servers have been developed which + identify this client as a single client. ISC has interpreted + RFC2131 to indicate that these clients must be treated as two + separate entities (and hence two, separate addresses). Client + behaviour (Embedded Windows products) has developed that relies on + the former implementation, and hence is incompatible with the + latter. Also, RFC2131 demands explicitly that some header fields + be zeroed upon certain message types. The ISC DHCP Server instead + copies many of these fields from the packet received from the client + or relay, which may not be zero. It is not known if there is a good + reason for this that has not been documented. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2132'>RFC2132<span> (</span><span class='info'>Alexander, S. and R. Droms, “DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions,” March 1997.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC2132] defines the initial set of + DHCP Options and provides a great deal of guidance on how to go about + formatting and processing options. The document unfortunately + waffles to a great extent about the NULL termination of DHCP Options, + and some DHCP Clients (Windows 95) have been implemented that rely + upon DHCP Options containing text strings to be NULL-terminated (or + else they crash). So, ISC DHCP detects if clients null-terminate the + host-name option and, if so, null terminates any text options it + transmits to the client. It also removes NULL termination from any + known text option it receives prior to any other processing. +</p> +<a name="anchor13"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5.2"></a><h3>5.2. +DHCPv4 Option References</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2241'>RFC2241<span> (</span><span class='info'>Provan, D., “DHCP Options for Novell Directory Services,” November 1997.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC2241] defines options for + Novell Directory Services. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2242'>RFC2242<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R. and K. Fong, “NetWare/IP Domain Name and Information,” November 1997.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC2242] defines an encapsulated + option space for NWIP configuration. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2485'>RFC2485<span> (</span><span class='info'>Drach, S., “DHCP Option for The Open Group's User Authentication Protocol,” January 1999.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC2485] defines the Open Group's + UAP option. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2610'>RFC2610<span> (</span><span class='info'>Perkins, C. and E. Guttman, “DHCP Options for Service Location Protocol,” June 1999.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC2610] defines options for + the Service Location Protocol (SLP). +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2937'>RFC2937<span> (</span><span class='info'>Smith, C., “The Name Service Search Option for DHCP,” September 2000.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC2937] defines the Name Service + Search Option (not to be confused with the domain-search option). + The Name Service Search Option allows eg nsswitch.conf to be + reconfigured via dhcp. The ISC DHCP server implements this option, + and the ISC DHCP client is compatible...but does not by default + install this option's value. One would need to make their relevant + dhclient-script process this option in a way that is suitable for + the system. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3004'>RFC3004<span> (</span><span class='info'>Stump, G., Droms, R., Gu, Y., Vyaghrapuri, R., Demirtjis, A., Beser, B., and J. Privat, “The User Class Option for DHCP,” November 2000.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3004] defines the User-Class + option. Note carefully that ISC DHCP currently does not implement + to this reference, but has (inexplicably) selected an incompatible + format: a plain text string. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3011'>RFC3011<span> (</span><span class='info'>Waters, G., “The IPv4 Subnet Selection Option for DHCP,” November 2000.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3011] defines the Subnet-Selection + plain DHCPv4 option. Do not confuse this option with the relay agent + "link selection" sub-option, although their behaviour is + similar. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3396'>RFC3396<span> (</span><span class='info'>Lemon, T. and S. Cheshire, “Encoding Long Options in the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4),” November 2002.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3396] documents both how long + options may be encoded in DHCPv4 packets, and also how multiple + instances of the same option code within a DHCPv4 packet will be + decoded by receivers. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3397'>RFC3397<span> (</span><span class='info'>Aboba, B. and S. Cheshire, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Domain Search Option,” November 2002.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3397] documents the Domain-Search + Option, which allows the configuration of the /etc/resolv.conf + 'search' parameter in a way that is <a class='info' href='#RFC1035'>RFC1035<span> (</span><span class='info'>Mockapetris, P., “Domain names - implementation and specification,” November 1987.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC1035] wire format compatible (in fact, it uses the RFC1035 wire + format). ISC DHCP has both client and server support, and supports + RFC1035 name compression. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3679'>RFC3679<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., “Unused Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option Codes,” January 2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3679] documents a number of + options that were documented earlier in history, but were not + made use of. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3925'>RFC3925<span> (</span><span class='info'>Littlefield, J., “Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4),” October 2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3925] documents a pair of + Enterprise-ID delimited option spaces for vendors to use in order + to inform servers of their "vendor class" (sort of like 'uname' + or 'who and what am I'), and a means to deliver vendor-specific + and vendor-documented option codes and values. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3942'>RFC3942<span> (</span><span class='info'>Volz, B., “Reclassifying Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4) Options,” November 2004.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3942] redefined the 'site local' + option space. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC4280'>[RFC4280]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Chowdhury, K., Yegani, P., and L. Madour, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Options for Broadcast and Multicast Control Servers,” November 2005.</span><span>)</span></a> defines two BCMS server options + for each protocol family. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC4388'>RFC4388<span> (</span><span class='info'>Woundy, R. and K. Kinnear, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Leasequery,” February 2006.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC4388] defined the DHCPv4 + LEASEQUERY message type and a number of suitable response messages, + for the purpose of sharing information about DHCP served addresses + and clients. +</p> +<a name="anchor14"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5.2.1"></a><h3>5.2.1. +Relay Agent Information Option Options</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3046'>RFC3046<span> (</span><span class='info'>Patrick, M., “DHCP Relay Agent Information Option,” January 2001.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3046] defines the Relay Agent + Information Option and provides a number of sub-option + definitions. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3256'>RFC3256<span> (</span><span class='info'>Jones, D. and R. Woundy, “The DOCSIS (Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications) Device Class DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) Relay Agent Information Sub-option,” April 2002.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3256] defines the DOCSIS Device + Class sub-option. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3527'>RFC3527<span> (</span><span class='info'>Kinnear, K., Stapp, M., Johnson, R., and J. Kumarasamy, “Link Selection sub-option for the Relay Agent Information Option for DHCPv4,” April 2003.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC3527] defines the Link Selection + sub-option. +</p> +<a name="anchor15"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5.2.2"></a><h3>5.2.2. +Dynamic DNS Updates References</h3> + +<p>The collection of documents that describe the standards-based + method to update dns names of DHCP clients starts most easily + with <a class='info' href='#RFC4703'>RFC4703<span> (</span><span class='info'>Stapp, M. and B. Volz, “Resolution of Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Conflicts among Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Clients,” October 2006.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC4703] to define the overall + architecture, travels through RFCs <a class='info' href='#RFC4702'>4702<span> (</span><span class='info'>Stapp, M., Volz, B., and Y. Rekhter, “The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Client Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Option,” October 2006.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC4702] + and <a class='info' href='#RFC4704'>4704<span> (</span><span class='info'>Volz, B., “The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Client Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Option,” October 2006.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC4704] to describe the DHCPv4 and + DHCPv6 FQDN options (to carry the client name), and ends up at + <a class='info' href='#RFC4701'>RFC4701<span> (</span><span class='info'>Stapp, M., Lemon, T., and A. Gustafsson, “A DNS Resource Record (RR) for Encoding Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Information (DHCID RR),” October 2006.</span><span>)</span></a> [RFC4701] which describes the DHCID + RR used in DNS to perform a kind of atomic locking. +</p> +<p>ISC DHCP adopted early versions of these documents, and has not + yet synchronized with the final standards versions. +</p> +<p>For RFCs 4702 and 4704, the 'N' bit is not yet supported. The + result is that it is always set zero, and is ignored if set. +</p> +<p>For RFC4701, which is used to match client identities with names + in the DNS as part of name conflict resolution. Note that ISC DHCP's + implementation of DHCIDs vary wildly from this specification. + First, ISC DHCP uses a TXT record in which the contents are stored + in hexadecimal. Second, there is a flaw in the selection of the + 'Identifier Type', which results in a completely different value + being selected than was defined in an older revision of this + document...also this field is one byte prior to hexadecimal + encoding rather than two. Third, ISC DHCP does not use a digest + type code. Rather, all values for such TXT records are reached + via an MD5 sum. In short, nothing is compatible, but the + principle of the TXT record is the same as the standard DHCID + record. However, for DHCPv6 FQDN, we do use DHCID type code '2', + as no other value really makes sense in our context. +</p> +<a name="anchor16"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5.2.3"></a><h3>5.2.3. +Experimental: Failover References</h3> + +<p>The Failover Protocol defines means by which two DHCP Servers + can share all the relevant information about leases granted to + DHCP clients on given networks, so that one of the two servers may + fail and be survived by a server that can act responsibly. +</p> +<p>Unfortunately it has been quite some years (2003) since the last + time this document was edited, and the authors no longer show any + interest in fielding comments or improving the document. +</p> +<p>The status of this protocol is very unsure, but ISC's + implementation of it has proven stable and suitable for use in + sizable production environments. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#draft-failover'>draft-ietf-dhc-failover-12.txt<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., “DHCP Failover Protocol,” March 2003.</span><span>)</span></a> [draft‑failover] + describes the Failover Protocol. In addition to what is described + in this document, ISC DHCP has elected to make some experimental + changes that may be revoked in a future version of ISC DHCP (if the + draft authors do not adopt the new behaviour). Specifically, ISC + DHCP's POOLREQ behaviour differs substantially from what is + documented in the draft, and the server also implements a form of + 'MAC Address Affinity' which is not described in the failover + document. The full nature of these changes have been described on + the IETF DHC WG mailing list (which has archives), and also in ISC + DHCP's manual pages. Also note that although this document + references a RECOVER-WAIT state, it does not document a protocol + number assignment for this state. As a consequence, ISC DHCP has + elected to use the value 254. +</p> +<p> An optimization described in the failover protocol draft + is included since 4.2.0a1. It permits a DHCP server + operating in communications-interrupted state to 'rewind' a + lease to the state most recently transmitted to its peer, + greatly increasing a server's endurance in + communications-interrupted. This is supported using a new + 'rewind state' record on the dhcpd.leases entry for each + lease. + +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3074'>[RFC3074]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Volz, B., Gonczi, S., Lemon, T., and R. Stevens, “DHC Load Balancing Algorithm,” February 2001.</span><span>)</span></a> describes the Load Balancing + Algorithm (LBA) that ISC DHCP uses in concert with the Failover + protocol. Note that versions 3.0.* are known to misimplement the + hash algorithm (it will only use the low 4 bits of every byte of + the hash bucket array). +</p> +<a name="anchor17"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.5.3"></a><h3>5.3. +DHCP Procedures</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC2939'>[RFC2939]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., “Procedures and IANA Guidelines for Definition of New DHCP Options and Message Types,” September 2000.</span><span>)</span></a> explains how to go about + obtaining a new DHCP Option code assignment. +</p> +<a name="anchor18"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.6"></a><h3>6. +DHCPv6 Protocol References</h3> + +<a name="anchor19"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.6.1"></a><h3>6.1. +DHCPv6 Protocol References</h3> + +<p>For now there is only one document that specifies the base + of the DHCPv6 protocol (there have been no updates yet), + <a class='info' href='#RFC3315'>[RFC3315]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” July 2003.</span><span>)</span></a>. +</p> +<p>Support for DHCPv6 was first added in version 4.0.0. The server + and client support only IA_NA. While the server does support multiple + IA_NAs within one packet from the client, our client only supports + sending one. There is no relay support. +</p> +<p>DHCPv6 introduces some new and uncomfortable ideas to the common + software library. +</p> +<p> + </p> +<ol class="text"> +<li>Options sometimes may appear multiple times. The common + library used to treat all appearance of multiple options as + specified in RFC2131 - to be concatenated. DHCPv6 options + may sometimes appear multiple times (such as with IA_NA or + IAADDR), but often must not. As of 4.2.1-P1, multiple IA_NA, IA_PD + or IA_TA are not supported. +</li> +<li>The same option space appears in DHCPv6 packets multiple times. + If the packet was got via a relay, then the client's packet is + stored to an option within the relay's packet...if there were two + relays, this recurses. At each of these steps, the root "DHCPv6 + option space" is used. Further, a client packet may contain an + IA_NA, which may contain an IAADDR - but really, in an abstract + sense, this is again re-encapsulation of the DHCPv6 option space + beneath options it also contains. +</li> +</ol><p> + +</p> +<p>Precisely how to correctly support the above conundrums has not + quite yet been settled, so support is incomplete. +</p> +<a name="anchor20"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.6.2"></a><h3>6.2. +DHCPv6 Options References</h3> + +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3319'>[RFC3319]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Schulzrinne, H. and B. Volz, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers,” July 2003.</span><span>)</span></a> defines the SIP server + options for DHCPv6. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3646'>[RFC3646]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Droms, R., “DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” December 2003.</span><span>)</span></a> documents the DHCPv6 + name-servers and domain-search options. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3633'>[RFC3633]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Troan, O. and R. Droms, “IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6,” December 2003.</span><span>)</span></a> documents the Identity + Association Prefix Delegation for DHCPv6, which is included + here for protocol wire reference, but which is not supported + by ISC DHCP. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC3898'>[RFC3898]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Kalusivalingam, V., “Network Information Service (NIS) Configuration Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” October 2004.</span><span>)</span></a> documents four NIS options + for delivering NIS servers and domain information in DHCPv6. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC4075'>[RFC4075]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Kalusivalingam, V., “Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6,” May 2005.</span><span>)</span></a> defines the DHCPv6 SNTP + Servers option. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC4242'>[RFC4242]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Venaas, S., Chown, T., and B. Volz, “Information Refresh Time Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),” November 2005.</span><span>)</span></a> defines the Information + Refresh Time option, which advises DHCPv6 Information-Request + clients to return for updated information. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC4280'>[RFC4280]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Chowdhury, K., Yegani, P., and L. Madour, “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Options for Broadcast and Multicast Control Servers,” November 2005.</span><span>)</span></a> defines two BCMS server options + for each protocol family. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC4580'>[RFC4580]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option,” June 2006.</span><span>)</span></a> defines a DHCPv6 + subscriber-id option, which is similar in principle to the DHCPv4 + relay agent option of the same name. +</p> +<p><a class='info' href='#RFC4649'>[RFC4649]<span> (</span><span class='info'>Volz, B., “Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option,” August 2006.</span><span>)</span></a> defines a DHCPv6 remote-id + option, which is similar in principle to the DHCPv4 relay agent + remote-id. +</p> +<a name="rfc.references"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<a name="rfc.section.7"></a><h3>7. +References</h3> + +<a name="rfc.references1"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<h3>7.1. Published DHCPv4 References</h3> +<table width="99%" border="0"> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC0760">[RFC0760]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Postel, J., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc760">DoD standard Internet Protocol</a>,” RFC 760, January 1980 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc760.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC0768">[RFC0768]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Postel, J., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc768">User Datagram Protocol</a>,” STD 6, RFC 768, August 1980 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc768.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC0894">[RFC0894]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Hornig, C., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc894">Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over Ethernet networks</a>,” STD 41, RFC 894, April 1984 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc894.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC0951">[RFC0951]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Croft, B. and J. Gilmore, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc951">Bootstrap Protocol</a>,” RFC 951, September 1985 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc951.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC1035">[RFC1035]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Mockapetris, P., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035">Domain names - implementation and specification</a>,” STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC1188">[RFC1188]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:dkatz@merit.edu">Katz, D.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1188">Proposed Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over FDDI Networks</a>,” RFC 1188, October 1990 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1188.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC1542">[RFC1542]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:Walter.Wimer@CMU.EDU">Wimer, W.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1542">Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol</a>,” RFC 1542, October 1993 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1542.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2131">[RFC2131]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:droms@bucknell.edu">Droms, R.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2131">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol</a>,” RFC 2131, March 1997 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2131.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2131.html">HTML</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2131.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2132">[RFC2132]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:sca@engr.sgi.com">Alexander, S.</a> and <a href="mailto:droms@bucknell.edu">R. Droms</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132">DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions</a>,” RFC 2132, March 1997 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2132.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2132.html">HTML</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2132.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2241">[RFC2241]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:donp@Novell.Com">Provan, D.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2241">DHCP Options for Novell Directory Services</a>,” RFC 2241, November 1997 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2241.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2241.html">HTML</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2241.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2242">[RFC2242]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:droms@bucknell.edu">Droms, R.</a> and <a href="mailto:kfong@novell.com">K. Fong</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2242">NetWare/IP Domain Name and Information</a>,” RFC 2242, November 1997 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2242.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2242.html">HTML</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2242.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2485">[RFC2485]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:drach@sun.com">Drach, S.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2485">DHCP Option for The Open Group's User Authentication Protocol</a>,” RFC 2485, January 1999 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2485.txt">TXT</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2485.html">HTML</a>, <a href="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2485.xml">XML</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2563">[RFC2563]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:rtroll@corp.home.net">Troll, R.</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2563">DHCP Option to Disable Stateless Auto-Configuration in IPv4 Clients</a>,” RFC 2563, May 1999 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2563.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2610">[RFC2610]</a></td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:Charles.Perkins@Sun.Com">Perkins, C.</a> and <a href="mailto:Erik.Guttman@Sun.Com">E. Guttman</a>, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2610">DHCP Options for Service Location Protocol</a>,” RFC 2610, June 1999 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2610.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2855">[RFC2855]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Fujisawa, K., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2855">DHCP for IEEE 1394</a>,” RFC 2855, June 2000 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2855.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2937">[RFC2937]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Smith, C., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2937">The Name Service Search Option for DHCP</a>,” RFC 2937, September 2000 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2937.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC2939">[RFC2939]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2939">Procedures and IANA Guidelines for Definition of New DHCP Options and Message Types</a>,” BCP 43, RFC 2939, September 2000 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2939.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3004">[RFC3004]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stump, G., Droms, R., Gu, Y., Vyaghrapuri, R., Demirtjis, A., Beser, B., and J. Privat, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3004">The User Class Option for DHCP</a>,” RFC 3004, November 2000 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3004.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3011">[RFC3011]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Waters, G., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3011">The IPv4 Subnet Selection Option for DHCP</a>,” RFC 3011, November 2000 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3011.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3046">[RFC3046]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Patrick, M., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3046">DHCP Relay Agent Information Option</a>,” RFC 3046, January 2001 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3046.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3074">[RFC3074]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Volz, B., Gonczi, S., Lemon, T., and R. Stevens, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3074">DHC Load Balancing Algorithm</a>,” RFC 3074, February 2001 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3074.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3118">[RFC3118]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R. and W. Arbaugh, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3118">Authentication for DHCP Messages</a>,” RFC 3118, June 2001 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3118.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3203">[RFC3203]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">T'Joens, Y., Hublet, C., and P. De Schrijver, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3203">DHCP reconfigure extension</a>,” RFC 3203, December 2001 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3203.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3256">[RFC3256]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Jones, D. and R. Woundy, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3256">The DOCSIS (Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications) Device Class DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) Relay Agent Information Sub-option</a>,” RFC 3256, April 2002 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3256.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3361">[RFC3361]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Schulzrinne, H., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3361">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP-for-IPv4) Option for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers</a>,” RFC 3361, August 2002 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3361.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3396">[RFC3396]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Lemon, T. and S. Cheshire, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3396">Encoding Long Options in the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4)</a>,” RFC 3396, November 2002 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3396.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3397">[RFC3397]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Aboba, B. and S. Cheshire, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3397">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Domain Search Option</a>,” RFC 3397, November 2002 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3397.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3442">[RFC3442]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Lemon, T., Cheshire, S., and B. Volz, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3442">The Classless Static Route Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 4</a>,” RFC 3442, December 2002 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3442.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3456">[RFC3456]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Patel, B., Aboba, B., Kelly, S., and V. Gupta, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3456">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4) Configuration of IPsec Tunnel Mode</a>,” RFC 3456, January 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3456.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3495">[RFC3495]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Beser, B. and P. Duffy, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3495">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option for CableLabs Client Configuration</a>,” RFC 3495, March 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3495.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3527">[RFC3527]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kinnear, K., Stapp, M., Johnson, R., and J. Kumarasamy, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3527">Link Selection sub-option for the Relay Agent Information Option for DHCPv4</a>,” RFC 3527, April 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3527.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3594">[RFC3594]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Duffy, P., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3594">PacketCable Security Ticket Control Sub-Option for the DHCP CableLabs Client Configuration (CCC) Option</a>,” RFC 3594, September 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3594.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3634">[RFC3634]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Luehrs, K., Woundy, R., Bevilacqua, J., and N. Davoust, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3634">Key Distribution Center (KDC) Server Address Sub-option for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) CableLabs Client Configuration (CCC) Option</a>,” RFC 3634, December 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3634.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3679">[RFC3679]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3679">Unused Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option Codes</a>,” RFC 3679, January 2004 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3679.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3825">[RFC3825]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Polk, J., Schnizlein, J., and M. Linsner, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3825">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for Coordinate-based Location Configuration Information</a>,” RFC 3825, July 2004 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3825.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3925">[RFC3925]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Littlefield, J., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3925">Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)</a>,” RFC 3925, October 2004 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3925.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3942">[RFC3942]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Volz, B., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3942">Reclassifying Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4) Options</a>,” RFC 3942, November 2004 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3942.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3993">[RFC3993]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3993">Subscriber-ID Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option</a>,” RFC 3993, March 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3993.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4014">[RFC4014]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R. and J. Schnizlein, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4014">Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Attributes Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Information Option</a>,” RFC 4014, February 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4014.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4030">[RFC4030]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stapp, M. and T. Lemon, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4030">The Authentication Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option</a>,” RFC 4030, March 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4030.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4039">[RFC4039]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Park, S., Kim, P., and B. Volz, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4039">Rapid Commit Option for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)</a>,” RFC 4039, March 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4039.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4174">[RFC4174]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Monia, C., Tseng, J., and K. Gibbons, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4174">The IPv4 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option for the Internet Storage Name Service</a>,” RFC 4174, September 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4174.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4243">[RFC4243]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stapp, M., Johnson, R., and T. Palaniappan, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4243">Vendor-Specific Information Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option</a>,” RFC 4243, December 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4243.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4361">[RFC4361]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Lemon, T. and B. Sommerfeld, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4361">Node-specific Client Identifiers for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Version Four (DHCPv4)</a>,” RFC 4361, February 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4361.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4388">[RFC4388]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Woundy, R. and K. Kinnear, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4388">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Leasequery</a>,” RFC 4388, February 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4388.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4390">[RFC4390]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kashyap, V., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4390">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) over InfiniBand</a>,” RFC 4390, April 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4436">[RFC4436]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Aboba, B., Carlson, J., and S. Cheshire, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4436">Detecting Network Attachment in IPv4 (DNAv4)</a>,” RFC 4436, March 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4436.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4701">[RFC4701]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stapp, M., Lemon, T., and A. Gustafsson, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4701">A DNS Resource Record (RR) for Encoding Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Information (DHCID RR)</a>,” RFC 4701, October 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4701.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4702">[RFC4702]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stapp, M., Volz, B., and Y. Rekhter, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4702">The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Client Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Option</a>,” RFC 4702, October 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4702.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4703">[RFC4703]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stapp, M. and B. Volz, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4703">Resolution of Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Conflicts among Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Clients</a>,” RFC 4703, October 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4703.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5010">[RFC5010]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kinnear, K., Normoyle, M., and M. Stapp, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5010">The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Version 4 (DHCPv4) Relay Agent Flags Suboption</a>,” RFC 5010, September 2007 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5010.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5071">[RFC5071]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Hankins, D., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5071">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options Used by PXELINUX</a>,” RFC 5071, December 2007 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5071.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5107">[RFC5107]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Johnson, R., Kumarasamy, J., Kinnear, K., and M. Stapp, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5107">DHCP Server Identifier Override Suboption</a>,” RFC 5107, February 2008 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5107.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5192">[RFC5192]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Morand, L., Yegin, A., Kumar, S., and S. Madanapalli, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5192">DHCP Options for Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Authentication Agents</a>,” RFC 5192, May 2008 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5192.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5223">[RFC5223]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Schulzrinne, H., Polk, J., and H. Tschofenig, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5223">Discovering Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Servers Using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)</a>,” RFC 5223, August 2008 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5223.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5859">[RFC5859]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Johnson, R., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5859">TFTP Server Address Option for DHCPv4</a>,” RFC 5859, June 2010 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5859.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5969">[RFC5969]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Townsley, W. and O. Troan, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5969">IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4 Infrastructures (6rd) -- Protocol Specification</a>,” RFC 5969, August 2010 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5969.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="draft-failover">[draft-failover]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R., “<a href="https://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-failover-12.txt">DHCP Failover Protocol</a>,” March 2003.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-relay-encapsulation">[I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-relay-encapsulation]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Lemon, T. and H. Deng, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-relay-encapsulation-00">Relay Agent Encapsulation for DHCPv4</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-relay-encapsulation-00 (work in progress), October 2010 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-relay-encapsulation-00.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-bulk-leasequery">[I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-bulk-leasequery]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kinnear, K., Volz, B., Russell, N., Stapp, M., Rao, D., Joshi, B., and P. Kurapati, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-bulk-leasequery-03">Bulk DHCPv4 Lease Query</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-bulk-leasequery-03 (work in progress), October 2010 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-bulk-leasequery-03.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id">[I-D.ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kurapati, P. and B. Joshi, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id-09">DHCPv4 lease query by Relay Agent Remote ID</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id-09 (work in progress), December 2010 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id-09.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption">[I-D.ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stapp, M., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-07">The DHCPv4 Relay Agent Identifier Suboption</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-07 (work in progress), July 2009 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-07.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-mip6-hiopt">[I-D.ietf-mip6-hiopt]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Jang, H., Yegin, A., Chowdhury, K., and J. Choi, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-17">DHCP Options for Home Information Discovery in MIPv6</a>,” draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-17 (work in progress), May 2008 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-17.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +</table> + +<a name="rfc.references2"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<h3>7.2. Published Common (DHCPv4/DHCPv6) References</h3> +<table width="99%" border="0"> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4280">[RFC4280]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Chowdhury, K., Yegani, P., and L. Madour, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4280">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Options for Broadcast and Multicast Control Servers</a>,” RFC 4280, November 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4280.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4477">[RFC4477]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Chown, T., Venaas, S., and C. Strauf, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4477">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP): IPv4 and IPv6 Dual-Stack Issues</a>,” RFC 4477, May 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4477.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4578">[RFC4578]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Johnston, M. and S. Venaas, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4578">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Options for the Intel Preboot eXecution Environment (PXE)</a>,” RFC 4578, November 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4578.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4776">[RFC4776]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Schulzrinne, H., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4776">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information</a>,” RFC 4776, November 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4776.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4833">[RFC4833]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Lear, E. and P. Eggert, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4833">Timezone Options for DHCP</a>,” RFC 4833, April 2007 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4833.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5417">[RFC5417]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Calhoun, P., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5417">Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Access Controller DHCP Option</a>,” RFC 5417, March 2009 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5417.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5678">[RFC5678]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Bajko, G. and S. Das, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5678">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Options for IEEE 802.21 Mobility Services (MoS) Discovery</a>,” RFC 5678, December 2009 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5678.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5908">[RFC5908]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Gayraud, R. and B. Lourdelet, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5908">Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6</a>,” RFC 5908, June 2010 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5908.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5970">[RFC5970]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Huth, T., Freimann, J., Zimmer, V., and D. Thaler, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5970">DHCPv6 Options for Network Boot</a>,” RFC 5970, September 2010 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5970.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5986">[RFC5986]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5986">Discovering the Local Location Information Server (LIS)</a>,” RFC 5986, September 2010 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5986.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-vpn-option">[I-D.ietf-dhc-vpn-option]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kinnear, K., Johnson, R., and M. Stapp, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-12">Virtual Subnet Selection Options for DHCPv4 and DHCPv6</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-12 (work in progress), October 2010 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-12.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +</table> + +<a name="rfc.references3"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<h3>7.3. Published DHCPv6 References</h3> +<table width="99%" border="0"> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3315">[RFC3315]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)</a>,” RFC 3315, July 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3315.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3319">[RFC3319]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Schulzrinne, H. and B. Volz, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3319">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers</a>,” RFC 3319, July 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3319.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3633">[RFC3633]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Troan, O. and R. Droms, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3633">IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6</a>,” RFC 3633, December 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3633.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3646">[RFC3646]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3646">DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)</a>,” RFC 3646, December 2003 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3646.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3736">[RFC3736]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3736">Stateless Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Service for IPv6</a>,” RFC 3736, April 2004 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3736.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC3898">[RFC3898]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kalusivalingam, V., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3898">Network Information Service (NIS) Configuration Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)</a>,” RFC 3898, October 2004 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3898.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4075">[RFC4075]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Kalusivalingam, V., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4075">Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Configuration Option for DHCPv6</a>,” RFC 4075, May 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4075.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4076">[RFC4076]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Chown, T., Venaas, S., and A. Vijayabhaskar, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4076">Renumbering Requirements for Stateless Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)</a>,” RFC 4076, May 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4076.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4242">[RFC4242]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Venaas, S., Chown, T., and B. Volz, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4242">Information Refresh Time Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)</a>,” RFC 4242, November 2005 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4242.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4580">[RFC4580]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Volz, B., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4580">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option</a>,” RFC 4580, June 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4580.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4649">[RFC4649]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Volz, B., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4649">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option</a>,” RFC 4649, August 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4649.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4704">[RFC4704]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Volz, B., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4704">The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Client Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) Option</a>,” RFC 4704, October 2006 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4704.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC4994">[RFC4994]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Zeng, S., Volz, B., Kinnear, K., and J. Brzozowski, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4994">DHCPv6 Relay Agent Echo Request Option</a>,” RFC 4994, September 2007 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4994.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5007">[RFC5007]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Brzozowski, J., Kinnear, K., Volz, B., and S. Zeng, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5007">DHCPv6 Leasequery</a>,” RFC 5007, September 2007 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5007.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="RFC5460">[RFC5460]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Stapp, M., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5460">DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery</a>,” RFC 5460, February 2009 (<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5460.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option">[I-D.ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Dec, W., Mrugalski, T., Sun, T., and B. Sarikaya, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-01">DHCPv6 Route Option</a>,” draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-01 (work in progress), March 2011 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-01.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra">[I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Miles, D., Ooghe, S., Dec, W., Krishnan, S., and A. Kavanagh, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra-03">Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra-03 (work in progress), October 2010 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra-03.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options">[I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Lemon, T. and W. Wu, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options-06">Relay-Supplied DHCP Options</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options-06 (work in progress), May 2011 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options-06.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-pd-exclude">[I-D.ietf-dhc-pd-exclude]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Korhonen, J., Savolainen, T., Krishnan, S., and O. Troan, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-01">Prefix Exclude Option for DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-01 (work in progress), January 2011 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-01.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6">[I-D.ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Jiang, S., “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-02">Secure DHCPv6 Using CGAs</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-02 (work in progress), December 2010 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-02.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-mext-nemo-pd">[I-D.ietf-mext-nemo-pd]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Droms, R., Thubert, P., Dupont, F., Haddad, W., and C. Bernardos, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-07">DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO</a>,” draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-07 (work in progress), December 2010 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-07.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-dhc-duid-uuid">[I-D.ietf-dhc-duid-uuid]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Narten, T. and J. Johnson, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-03">Definition of the UUID-based DHCPv6 Unique Identifier (DUID-UUID)</a>,” draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-03 (work in progress), February 2011 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-03.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option">[I-D.ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Hankins, D. and T. Mrugalski, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-10">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Option for Dual- Stack Lite</a>,” draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-10 (work in progress), March 2011 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-10.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-mif-dns-server-selection">[I-D.ietf-mif-dns-server-selection]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Savolainen, T. and J. Kato, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-dns-server-selection-01">Improved DNS Server Selection for Multi-Homed Nodes</a>,” draft-ietf-mif-dns-server-selection-01 (work in progress), March 2011 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mif-dns-server-selection-01.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="I-D.ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis">[I-D.ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Polk, J., Linsner, M., Thomson, M., and B. Aboba, “<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-17">Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options for Coordinate-based Location Configuration Information</a>,” draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-17 (work in progress), February 2011 (<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-17.txt">TXT</a>).</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text" valign="top"><a name="draft-addr-params">[draft-addr-params]</a></td> +<td class="author-text">Mrugalski, T., “<a href="http://klub.com.pl/dhcpv6/doc/draft-mrugalski-addropts-XX-2007-04-17.txt">Address Parameters Option for DHCPv6</a>,” April 2007.</td></tr> +</table> + +<a name="rfc.authors"></a><br /><hr /> +<table summary="layout" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" class="TOCbug" align="right"><tr><td class="TOCbug"><a href="#toc"> TOC </a></td></tr></table> +<h3>Authors' Addresses</h3> +<table width="99%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">David W. Hankins</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">Internet Systems Consortium, + Inc.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">950 Charter Street</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">Redwood City, CA 94063</td></tr> +<tr cellpadding="3"><td> </td><td> </td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">Tomasz Mrugalski</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">Internet Systems Consortium, + Inc.</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">950 Charter Street</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author-text"> </td> +<td class="author-text">Redwood City, CA 94063</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author" align="right">Phone: </td> +<td class="author-text">+1 650 423 1345</td></tr> +<tr><td class="author" align="right">Email: </td> +<td class="author-text"><a href="mailto:Tomasz_Mrugalski@isc.org">Tomasz_Mrugalski@isc.org</a></td></tr> +</table> +</body></html> |