diff options
author | Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> | 2012-08-23 00:24:39 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2012-08-28 01:50:02 -0500 |
commit | 0214b6b4deb87d70bfc5fb00ba62f85fcf06f8ab (patch) | |
tree | 65d258cd04ff1702cc9f56310169c2f3f309da10 | |
parent | 63f7166a80a204e8d6d1732315b5c924d46f31d3 (diff) |
target-i386/translate.c: mov to/from crN/drN: ignore mod bits
> This instruction is always treated as a register-to-register (MOD = 11)
> instruction, regardless of the encoding of the MOD field in the MODR/M
> byte.
Also, Microport UNIX System V/386 v 2.1 (ca 1987) runs fine on
real Intel 386 and 486 CPU's (at least), but does not run in qemu without
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net>
Signed-off-by: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
(cherry picked from commit 5c73b757e3aa80dc84352b2ede0d8bdea5419f6d)
Conflicts:
target-i386/translate.c
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-rw-r--r-- | target-i386/translate.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/target-i386/translate.c b/target-i386/translate.c index c1ede1a75..c792e7ace 100644 --- a/target-i386/translate.c +++ b/target-i386/translate.c @@ -7409,8 +7409,11 @@ static target_ulong disas_insn(DisasContext *s, target_ulong pc_start) gen_exception(s, EXCP0D_GPF, pc_start - s->cs_base); } else { modrm = ldub_code(s->pc++); - if ((modrm & 0xc0) != 0xc0) - goto illegal_op; + /* Ignore the mod bits (assume (modrm&0xc0)==0xc0). + * AMD documentation (24594.pdf) and testing of + * intel 386 and 486 processors all show that the mod bits + * are assumed to be 1's, regardless of actual values. + */ rm = (modrm & 7) | REX_B(s); reg = ((modrm >> 3) & 7) | rex_r; if (CODE64(s)) @@ -7451,8 +7454,11 @@ static target_ulong disas_insn(DisasContext *s, target_ulong pc_start) gen_exception(s, EXCP0D_GPF, pc_start - s->cs_base); } else { modrm = ldub_code(s->pc++); - if ((modrm & 0xc0) != 0xc0) - goto illegal_op; + /* Ignore the mod bits (assume (modrm&0xc0)==0xc0). + * AMD documentation (24594.pdf) and testing of + * intel 386 and 486 processors all show that the mod bits + * are assumed to be 1's, regardless of actual values. + */ rm = (modrm & 7) | REX_B(s); reg = ((modrm >> 3) & 7) | rex_r; if (CODE64(s)) |